{"id":17,"date":"2018-01-26T23:09:26","date_gmt":"2018-01-26T23:09:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/?p=17"},"modified":"2018-01-26T23:09:26","modified_gmt":"2018-01-26T23:09:26","slug":"week-2-readings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/uncategorized\/week-2-readings\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 2 Readings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">By focusing on presenting itself as palatable (read: normal) to those who made up the heterosexual, mainstream society, the gay liberation movement shifted toward embracing gay rights for nuclear families rather than the deconstructivist goals of sexual liberation. As a result of this shift, many LGBT individuals fell outside the new norms that largely prescribed how to appear as a harmless gay man or lesbian woman. These norms were established by the very movement once characterized by its belief in the radical politics of sexuality and led to even some of the leaders of this movement becoming overlooked. One of the main issues with focusing on gay rights is that it established a hierarchy of those who were deemed \u201cacceptable\u201d and those who are not.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The term transgender defined as \u201can umbrella term for anyone who crosses gender lines\u201d extends to both those who change aspects of their appearance, such as their clothing or behavior, to cross gender lines and those who are what Wilchins names \u201cvisibly queer,\u201d referring to people who publicly display their sexual orientation. Because of the common political problems shared by these two groups of people, Wilchins argues that it makes sense for them to ally themselves with each other.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When people choose to identify solely with the term \u201cqueer,\u201d I\u2019ve noticed that there\u2019s an inclination to try to figure out what subcategory within the queerness someone falls under. Much like how we feel the need to find out someone\u2019s gender and feel uncomfortable when we\u2019re unable to discern it, the same often goes for sexuality. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">I found the concepts of \u201cLanguage as the Real\u201d and \u201cThe Other and the Binary\u201d to be the most helpful for the basic purposes of discussing sexuality and gender. With Language as the Real, it\u2019s pointed out that language focuses the standard or what is shared, and when this applies to personal matters, there are either no words or no positive words to describe non-normative experiences. Similarly, the reductive nature of locating meaning in difference makes the Other and the Binary and important tool in considering what lies between whatever two options we\u2019re given. I understand Wilchin\u2019s argument that inclusivity in response to binaries is largely unhelpful because we consider only two real genders to exist, but I\u2019m confused by the \u201cterms\u201d within a binary and how each one can hold a different significance.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By focusing on presenting itself as palatable (read: normal) to those who made up the heterosexual, mainstream society, the gay liberation movement shifted toward embracing gay rights for nuclear families rather than the deconstructivist goals of sexual liberation. As a result of this shift, many LGBT individuals fell outside the new norms that largely prescribed &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/uncategorized\/week-2-readings\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Week 2 Readings&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18,"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17\/revisions\/18"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lzigelyte.digitalscholar.rochester.edu\/queertheory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}