What struck me most about the portion of “Shoulders to Stand On” that we watched in class was profundity of the loneliness that so many of the interviewees discussed. To suppress one’s self in most (if not all) interactions is a heavy burden to carry alone. Not knowing if you’re safe around even the people close to you, and relying on hints and a loose collection of coded phrases to connect with people like yourself is an incredibly stressful way to live. There are many reasons to form LGBTQ groups, from education to activism. But perhaps the most important reason, especially before the widespread use of the internet, is simply for community, for knowing that at the very least there is someone else who understands. While the Rochester Gay Liberation Front was of course an activist group, its function as a space for LGBTQ people to meet in relative safety led to social connections that were (are) crucial not only for organizational purposes, but for the general well-being of its members. In an environment or society where one’s anonymity or closetedness can mean the difference between life and death, knowing that there are others in your community, or on the airwaves of your local radio station, that feel the same things you do, and aren’t ashamed of who they are, can mean everything. Inspiration and necessity go hand-in-hand in rights movements. It is these human connections, this solidarity, that makes change possible.
The article “‘Perversity to Diversity’ exhibit causes controversy at University of Rochester” was published in the April 1991 edition of The Empty Closet. I found this information by visiting rochester.edu and searching for the title of the article, which directed me to a PDF with the month and year of the publication in its title.